My title is a bit bold, but math will prove me right. No, I am not going to use
multi-dimensional calculus or other forms of advanced math. The "complicated" math I am
going to use is simply done using a compounding or future value calculator that can
be found several places on the web or even in the app store for your
phone. For ease, here is one you
can use to verify the math.
Let's do this whole thing telling a story. October 21st this year marked the day
on which Marty McFly used the time travel machine that Doc Brown built out of
a modified Delorean. Let's
assume for moment that while Marty and Doc are out doing their thing, you find
the DeLorean and go back in time to visit your great grandfather late in
the year 1912. After
recovering from the shock, you convince your ancestor to take the $100 dollars
you hand him and invest it in the stock market on January 1, 1913. Your ancestor does your bidding and
invests in a mutual fund that does exactly what Dave Ramsay says happens with
good mutual funds: "gives you an average rate of return of 12%."
By the skin of your teeth you make it back to 2015, get out
of the car, and return it to its hiding place without being noticed. Awesome plan right? I am sure you are wondering, "How
much money do I now have?" Using
the calculator I mentioned above, the year (N) is 102 (the number of years from
1913-2015), starting amount is $100, and the interest rate is 12%. The result
is: $10,477,033 (I am rounding: the actual amount is $10,477,033.01)
Eureka! Congratulations!
You can now retire. But
hold on a minute my dear Watson; you do not have the whole story. I know this is a story, but any good
story is rooted in reality. The
reality is, you have had to pay taxes on your growth every year. Looking through the history of the tax
rates in the US, we learn that the average maximum tax rate is 58.3%. When we factor in that average tax
rate what do you think the account value would be? (This requires a slightly
more complicated calculation - i.e. doing 102 calculations each time
subtracting out the taxes paid from your account) Would you be surprised to
learn that your account would now be worth a massive $14,554? Immediately you feel jaded and cheated
by our blood sucking government for stealing $10,462,479 from you. But guess what? Looking at the history,
the government has only collected $20,209 in taxes over that time.
That is only a total of $34,663 that your $100 dollars has
generated over the last 102 years. WHERE IS THE OTHER $10,442,370 you
demand! The simple
answer? Taxes destroy
wealth. Notice I did not
qualify whose wealth they destroy. To
put a finer point on it, the title of the article is not “Taxes Destroy YOUR
Wealth.”
Here is the odd thing, if taxes were lower what would have
actually happened? Making
the same calculation using a 25% tax bracket your account value would be
$656,905 and the government would have collected $218,935. Certainly not $10 million, but a whole
lot more than $14,554, and better for the government as well.
That is a cool you say. Let's lower the taxes to 15%. What is your account value now?
$2,006,886 and the government collects $354,139. Getting better…
This entire discussion proves what is called the Laffer
curve. Simply defined,
there is an optimum tax rate that gives the maximum to the individual and the
maximum to the government.
In our scenario the optimum tax rate is 9%. Under these conditions you have
$3,899,472 and the government collects $385,652. This total wealth generated by
the original $100 you took to the past is still $6,192,009 less; wealth has
simply been destroyed because the growth of the money was hampered by taxes.
(Note: the optimal tax rate does vary based on what we believe the growth rate
will be, but generally the optimum rate is between 10-15%.)
What I am showing you is not new; it is well documented and
understood. In fact, Ibn
Khaldun, a 14th century Muslim philosopher, wrote in his work The Muqaddimah:
"It should be known that at the beginning of the dynasty, taxation yields
a large revenue from small assessments. At the end of the dynasty, taxation
yields a small revenue from large assessments." It is this same Ibn Khaldum that
Laffer gives credit for "his" curve.
Need further proof this is well known? Listen to the politicians when the
talk about tax rates, they are all talking about 10-15% flat taxes.
So how do you want your money? In a taxable or non-taxable
environment? Tax-deferred
is exactly what is says: tax deferred, i.e. pay taxes later.
Don't misunderstand me, taxes are necessary, we need roads,
bridges and other basic things, but the more they take the less they and us
get.
Conclusion: Taxes Destroy Wealth.
No comments:
Post a Comment